"Dream - Family lawyer Vina Cirebon, Hotman Paris Hutapea, questions the decision of the West Java Police to remove two names from the List of People Sought (DPO) in the murder case of his client. The West Java Police did indeed remove two names from the DPO in the murder case of Vina Cirebon, namely Andi and Dani. The West Java Police only stopped at one DPO that has already been captured, namely Pegi Setiawan alias Perong."

Hotman admitted to being confused by the police statement, considering that in the BAP until the verdict it was stated that there are three DPOs. According to Hotman Paris, it seems impossible for a number of Vina's murderers to fabricate stories about names because it was clearly detailed in the BAP.

"If they shift the responsibility, it could be directed to a fictitious person. This is not the case; they admit to both having acted. Is it possible that they made up names?" said Hotman in an Instagram post. Hotman claimed he was not too surprised by the statement made by the West Java Police. This is because he had already predicted that decision."

"Press release from Polda Jabar: only 9 perpetrators, where are the other 2 perpetrators? (Hotman had predicted this 3 days earlier ...)," wrote Hotman. He then uploaded the court decision which clearly stated that there are still 3 other DPOs outside the 8 perpetrators who have been sentenced. The three DPOs are named Andi, Dani, and Pegi alias Perong."

"Copy the final sheet of the court decision regarding the convicted in the Vina Cirebon case! In all the court decisions regarding the convicted, there are 3 DPOs mentioned. The Vina Cirebon case," he said. Previously, the Director of Criminal Investigation of West Java Police, Kombes Pol Surawan, removed two names of the perpetrators in the Vina Cirebon murder case, namely Dani and Andi, from the wanted list (DPO)."

"

"DPO one, not two. It turns out that the names Dani and Andi do not exist. So the correct DPO is one, under the name PS (Pegi Setiawan). Therefore, the total number of suspects is nine, not 11," said Surawan, Sunday, May 26, 2024. He explained that the confusion regarding the number of DPOs was caused by differing statements from the suspects during the examination process. After the investigation, it turned out that the two names that were mentioned, namely Andi and Dani, do not exist or are fictitious.