Mahfud MD Reminds PTUN Not to Play Around in Trying to Grant Anwar Usman's Lawsuit

pilpres 2024

Mahfud MD Reminds PTUN Not to Play Around in Trying to Grant Anwar Usman's Lawsuit

The translation of the given 'Bahasa' text to 'English' while preserving the HTML tags is as follows:

Decision of the Constitutional Court regarding Anwar Usman's ethical violation is not a decision of the state administration.

Dream - Vice Presidential candidate number 3, Mahfud MD, reminded the State Administrative Court (PTUN) not to play around with the lawsuit of the constitutional judge and former Chairman of the Constitutional Court (MK), Anwar Usman.

"PTUN should not play around in trying to grant Uncle Usman's request,"
The translation of the given 'Bahasa' text to 'English' while preserving the HTML tags is: "words of Mahfud Md in the Tabrak Prof event, in Yogyakarta quoted on Tuesday, February 6, 2024."

"Dream.co.id."

Mahfud assessed that the Administrative Court (PTUN) cannot grant Anwar Usman's request to revoke his dismissal. The reason is that the decision of the Constitutional Court Honor Council (MKMK) is not a decision of the state that can be tried by the PTUN. "Because PTUN only tries concrete, individual, and final decisions of the state administration. Whereas this MKMK decision is not a decision of the state, but a decision of the professional ethical council," Mahfud explained.

On that occasion, Mahfud also compared the issue of Anwar Usman with the decision of the Election Organizer Honor Council (DKPP) regarding the violation of the code of ethics by the General Election Commission (KPU RI) which does not affect the candidacy of Gibran Rakabuming as Vice President.

"Similar to the case of the Constitutional Court. The decision-making process violated very serious ethics, so Mas Gibran passed by violating ethics, but according to the constitution, the decision is okay, but those who are punished are those who violated it."
Mahfud said.

"Dream.co.id."

"That's why. Then, Uncle Usman was dismissed, it is clear that it violates heavy ethics. Now Uncle Usman is complaining again to the Administrative Court to have his dismissal revoked,"
"lanjutnya" translates to "continue."

"Dream.co.id."

"Previously, Anwar Usman filed a lawsuit to the Jakarta Administrative Court (PTUN) with the main claim requesting the decision of appointing Suhartoyo as the new Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court (MK) to be declared invalid."

"In the main case, granting the plaintiff's lawsuit in its entirety, declaring null and void Constitutional Court Decision Number 17 of 2023, dated November 9, 2023, regarding the Appointment of the Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court for the Term 2023-2028."

The following is the translation of the 'Bahasa' text to 'English' while preserving any HTML tags: "the sound of the substance of Anwar's lawsuit in the Case Tracking Information System of the Jakarta Administrative Court, in Jakarta quoted from Merdeka.com."

"In the main lawsuit, Anwar also requested the revocation of the decision to appoint Suhartoyo as Chairman of the Constitutional Court. Anwar also requested that Suhartoyo, as the defendant, rehabilitate his good name and restore his position as Chairman of the Constitutional Court. 'Requiring the defendant to rehabilitate the good name and restore the position of the plaintiff as the Chairman of the Constitutional Court for the period 2023-2028, as it was before being dismissed,' stated Anwar Usman's main lawsuit."

News

Mahfud MD Reminds PTUN Not to Play Around in Trying to Grant Anwar Usman's Lawsuit

"PTUN should not play around in trying to grant Uncle Usman's request,"The translation of the given 'Bahasa' text to 'English' while preserving the HTML tags is: "words of Mahfud Md in the Tabrak Prof event, in Yogyakarta quoted on Tuesday, February 6, 2024."

"Similar to the case of the Constitutional Court. The decision-making process violated very serious ethics, so Mas Gibran passed by violating ethics, but according to the constitution, the decision is okay, but those who are punished are those who violated it."Mahfud said.

"That's why. Then, Uncle Usman was dismissed, it is clear that it violates heavy ethics. Now Uncle Usman is complaining again to the Administrative Court to have his dismissal revoked,""lanjutnya" translates to "continue."

"In the main case, granting the plaintiff's lawsuit in its entirety, declaring null and void Constitutional Court Decision Number 17 of 2023, dated November 9, 2023, regarding the Appointment of the Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court for the Term 2023-2028."

"PTUN should not play around in trying to grant Uncle Usman's request,"
The translation of the given 'Bahasa' text to 'English' while preserving the HTML tags is: "words of Mahfud Md in the Tabrak Prof event, in Yogyakarta quoted on Tuesday, February 6, 2024."

"Similar to the case of the Constitutional Court. The decision-making process violated very serious ethics, so Mas Gibran passed by violating ethics, but according to the constitution, the decision is okay, but those who are punished are those who violated it."
Mahfud said.

"That's why. Then, Uncle Usman was dismissed, it is clear that it violates heavy ethics. Now Uncle Usman is complaining again to the Administrative Court to have his dismissal revoked,"
"lanjutnya" translates to "continue."