Prabowo-Gibran Team Says Presidential Election Lawsuit to Constitutional Court in the Wrong Room: Their Request Sweeps the World

Tim Prabowo-Gibran Sebut Gugatan Pilpres ke MK Salah Kamar: Permohonannya Sapu Jagad

Team Prabowo-Gibran Mentioned the Wrong Room for Presidential Election Lawsuit to Constitutional Court: Their Request is Widespread

Prabowo-Gibran Team Says Presidential Election Lawsuit to Constitutional Court in the Wrong Room: Their Request Sweeps the World

"Dream - Legal Team of Candidate Pair 02 Prabowo-Gibran assesses that the dispute request for the 2024 Presidential Election filed by the Anies-Muhaimin and Ganjar-Mahfud Md pairs is in the wrong room. This assessment was conveyed during the continued session of the Constitutional Court's Dispute over the General Election Results (PHPU) on Thursday, March 28, 2024."

"We know that this matter should not be submitted to the Constitutional Court (MK), but to the Election Supervisory Board (Bawaslu). Because the content of the application does not comply with the provisions of the Election Law, especially Article 475 of the Election Law, it can be said that the applicant's request is in the wrong chamber.""

Legal representative of Prabowo-Gibran, Otto Hasibuan, at the Constitutional Court (MK) on Thursday, March 28, 2024.

According to Otto, the second petitum of the applicants is not in accordance with the applicable procedural law in the Constitutional Court. Otto mentioned that the application and petitum are targeting everywhere.

"Petitum pemohon tidak sesuai dengan hukum acara yang berlaku di Mahkamah Konstitusi, karena kita lihat petitum pemohon telah menyasar kemana-mana, sehingga terkesan permohonan tersebut, petitum tersebut, seperti petitum sapu jagat," "The petitioner's petitum is not in accordance with the applicable procedural law at the Constitutional Court, because we see that the petitioner's petitum has targeted everywhere, so it gives the impression that the petition, the petitum, is like a sweeping demand."
"Otto said."

"Dream.co.id."

Otto conveyed that both parties of the applicants requested the Constitutional Court (MK) to decide on the parties that were not brought to trial. However, Otto did not further explain the parties he was referring to.

Denying the Existence of Fraud by Candidate Pair 02

Regarding the alleged fraud and violations of the 2024 Elections that are accused against Prabowo-Gibran, Otto affirms that it is not true.

"If the applicant accuses there being fraud or election violation, and we declare firmly in this trial, that as the legal representatives of Prabowo-Gibran, we firmly state and refute that it is not true,"
say Otto.

"Dream.co.id."

"But it is precisely the applicants, the applicant's side, who committed the fraud, and we will prove it in this trial," he said.

As known, in the second petitum, both plaintiffs, namely candidate 01 and candidate 02, request for the disqualification of candidate 02 Prabowo-Gibran. Then, both of them also request for a re-election to be held without the participation of candidate 02 Prabowo-Gibran.

portrait of tolerance

Sad Story of a Non-Muslim Boarding House Child Starving Comes to the Mosque Asking for Leftover Takjil, The Response of the Congregation Surprises Him

Putting aside his embarrassment, he comes to the mosque before iftar time.

Team Prabowo-Gibran Mentioned the Wrong Room for Presidential Election Lawsuit to Constitutional Court: Their Request is Widespread

Denying the Existence of Fraud by Candidate Pair 02

"If the applicant accuses there being fraud or election violation, and we declare firmly in this trial, that as the legal representatives of Prabowo-Gibran, we firmly state and refute that it is not true,"say Otto.

"If the applicant accuses there being fraud or election violation, and we declare firmly in this trial, that as the legal representatives of Prabowo-Gibran, we firmly state and refute that it is not true,"
say Otto.