In the Constitutional Court, Yusril Acknowledges that the Constitutional Court's Decision on the Age Limit for Vice Presidential Candidates is Legally Flawed

Di Sidang MK, Yusril Akui Putusan MK Soal Batas Usia Cawapres Cacat Hukum

"In the Constitutional Court Session, Yusril Admits Constitutional Court Decision Regarding the Age Limit for Vice Presidential Candidates is Legally Flawed"

Dream - Chief of the Prabowo-Gibran Defense Team, Yusril Ihza Mahendra, acknowledges the decision of the Constitutional Court (MK) in case 90 regarding the minimum age requirements for presidential and vice-presidential candidates with legal disabilities. Yusril expressed this opinion after the legal representative of the Ganjar-Mahfud team, Luthfi Yazid, brought up his previous statement before becoming the legal representative of the Prabowo-Gibran camp, where he had considered the decision problematic.

Kata Luthfi, Yusril also once speculated that if he were to become Gibran, he would not advance as a vice presidential candidate. Because that decision contains legal smuggling. "There is a constitutional law expert, Yusril Ihza Mahendra, in an interview and various media, he said that decision number 90 MK is seriously legally flawed. It even contains legal smuggling. That is why the MK decision has long-lasting impacts," said Luthfi in the 2024 Presidential Election dispute hearing at the Constitutional Court building on Tuesday, April 2, 2024.

In the Constitutional Court, Yusril Acknowledges that the Constitutional Court's Decision on the Age Limit for Vice Presidential Candidates is Legally Flawed

"Because of that, Brother Yusril said, 'If I were Gibran, then I would ask him not to continue his vice presidential candidacy.' I request a response from you," he continued.

Yusril immediately responded to Luthfi's statement in the trial. He said that Luthfi's quoted statement was inaccurate. "I want to clarify Luthfi's words. The words that say, 'If I were Gibran, I would ask him', are illogical. 'If I were Gibran, I would behave like this', that would be logical," said Yusril.

Yusril continued his explanation about the verdict of case 90. Yusril admitted that the Constitutional Court's verdict contained many problems.

"So what I'm saying is, if I were Gibran, I would choose not to move forward because I know that this decision is problematic."
He said.

"dream.co.id"

According to him, the decision is considered ethically flawed from a moral philosophy perspective. However, Yusril says that the decision must be obeyed as a form of legal certainty. Yusril believes that in legal philosophy, the issue of justice and legal certainty is something difficult to reconcile.

"That decision 90 is problematic when viewed from the perspective of legal philosophy, ethics, and others. But in terms of legal certainty, decision 90 is very clear,""
Yusril's words.

"dream.co.id"

"When we are faced with a concrete case, according to you, should we debate about endless justice, or should we end it with legal certainty? That is my question,"
"imbuhnya" in English is "added" or "furthermore".

"dream.co.id"

unik

Viral Content of Iftar Gathering Becomes a Show-off of Wealth, Shining Jewelry Like a Mobile Gold Shop

Funny moment of a woman showing off her wealth during iftar gathering, wearing sparkling jewelry.

"In the Constitutional Court Session, Yusril Admits Constitutional Court Decision Regarding the Age Limit for Vice Presidential Candidates is Legally Flawed"

"So what I'm saying is, if I were Gibran, I would choose not to move forward because I know that this decision is problematic."He said.

"That decision 90 is problematic when viewed from the perspective of legal philosophy, ethics, and others. But in terms of legal certainty, decision 90 is very clear,""Yusril's words.

"When we are faced with a concrete case, according to you, should we debate about endless justice, or should we end it with legal certainty? That is my question,""imbuhnya" in English is "added" or "furthermore".

"So what I'm saying is, if I were Gibran, I would choose not to move forward because I know that this decision is problematic."
He said.

"That decision 90 is problematic when viewed from the perspective of legal philosophy, ethics, and others. But in terms of legal certainty, decision 90 is very clear,""
Yusril's words.

"When we are faced with a concrete case, according to you, should we debate about endless justice, or should we end it with legal certainty? That is my question,"
"imbuhnya" in English is "added" or "furthermore".