Constitutional Court Rejects AMIN's Argument on Jokowi's Election Meddling: No Strong Evidence Found

MK Tolak Dalil AMIN Soal Jokowi Cawe-Cawe Pemilu: Tak Ada Bukti Kuat

MK Rejects AMIN's Argument Regarding Jokowi's Election Campaign: No Strong Evidence

Constitutional Court Rejects AMIN's Argument on Jokowi's Election Meddling: No Strong Evidence Found

"Dream - Constitutional Court Judge Daniel Yusmic Foekh said that the Court did not find strong evidence indicating President Joko Widodo's involvement in any fraudulent actions in the 2024 Election. The Court deemed the petitioner's claim of such actions to be unsupported by legal grounds."

"The court also did not find any evidence of a correlation between the mentioned cawe-cawe form and the potential vote acquisition of one of the presidential and vice-presidential candidate pairs in the 2024 Election."
Daniel's words in the Presidential Election dispute hearing at the Constitutional Court on Monday, April 22, 2024.

"Dream.co.id."

There is no strong evidence

Daniel mentioned, the Court sees the evidence that the president's involvement in the 2024 Election is not explained in more detail by the applicant. The applicants are also considered not to include strong evidence.

"The various pieces of evidence submitted by the Applicant, including evidence in the form of articles and video recordings of news from the mass media, indeed show the activities and statements of the President who intends to campaign in the 2024 Presidential and Vice Presidential Election [video Evidence P-36 and Evidence P-120)."
say it.

"Dream.co.id."

"However, according to the Court, the statement is without strong evidence in the trial," he continued.

According to the Court, such action cannot simply be interpreted as a desire to interfere in the organization of the 2024 Presidential and Vice Presidential Elections by using methods outside of the law and outside of the constitution.

"Furthermore, regarding the Applicant's a quo argument, the Court did not find any evidence of objection from the participants of the 2024 Presidential and Vice Presidential Elections after the determination of the presidential and vice presidential candidate pairs who questioned the statement of the president regarding the conduct of the Presidential and Vice Presidential Elections."

"tuturnya." translates to "he/she said."

"Reading of the Verdict on the Lawsuit of the Presidential Election 2024"

As information, the Constitutional Court held a hearing for the reading of the decision on the dispute over the results of the 2024 Presidential Election (PHPU) on Monday, April 22. The reading was conducted at 09.00 WIB.

"The verdict was read separately according to the case registration number submitted by the Anies Baswedan-Muhaimin Iskandar and Ganjar Pranowo-Mahfud MD camps. The Constitutional Court (MK) has confirmed that it has sent a letter containing the determined schedule to each camp and the General Election Commission (KPU) as the respondent, Prabowo-Gibran and their legal representatives, as well as the Election Supervisory Board (Bawaslu) as the related party."

News

Constitutional Court Does Not Find Correlation between Distribution of Social Assistance and Increase in Prabowo-Gibran's Voice

Constitutional Judge Arsul Sani assesses that there is no anomaly in the social assistance budget ahead of the 2024 Presidential Election.