IT Expert Kubu Ganjar Calls Sirekap Silent Witness to Election Fraud in 2024: Already by Design

Ahli IT Kubu Ganjar Sebut Sirekap Saksi Bisu Kejahatan Pemilu 2024: Sudah <i>by Design</i>

IT expert Kubu Ganjar calls Sirekap a Silent Witness to the Election Crime 2024: Already by Design.

IT Expert Kubu Ganjar Calls Sirekap Silent Witness to Election Fraud in 2024: Already by Design

Dream - Leony Lidya, a lecturer in Informatics Engineering at Pasundan University, claims that the vote recapitulation application for the 2024 Election, Sirekap, was intentionally created to be full of controversy.

Leony assesses that Sirekap KPU is a silent witness to the fraud of the 2024 Election because the application has already been arranged.

Leony conveyed that opinion while acting as an expert witness for the Ganjar-Mahfud camp in the continued hearing of the 2024 Presidential Election dispute at the Constitutional Court, Tuesday, April 2, 2024.

"Today I concluded that the controversy surrounding Sirekap is by design. Therefore, I consider it when the KPU disregards Sirekap by claiming that Sirekap is not used for hierarchical recapitulation. I see Sirekap as a silent witness to the crimes of the 2024 Election."
"Leony said."

"dream.co.id"

He said, this conclusion is based on five chronological stages of the Sirekap controversy.

Data Does Not Match

First, the uploaded C1 form in Sirekap does not match the vote count at the polling station (TPS). Then, the process of fixing the vote count in Sirekap can only be done by the group of election organizers (KPPS).

"After sparking controversy, the General Election Commission of Indonesia (KPU RI) allows district/city KPU to edit the vote count in Sirekap."

"Furthermore, the third controversy is that the KPU (Election Commission) closed the numeric information of C1 and D (results). Then, upload the incomplete C1 and D (results) until the determination of the national recapitulation results,"
"Leony said."

"dream.co.id"

Another controversy, he added, the KPU then admitted to not using Sirekap to display the static presentation of each candidate's votes. "From here, from the first three phenomena alone, I have gathered something that there has been a change in the program code," said Lidya.

Sharing food

Sharing Food with Others, Especially Those Who Are Fasting, the Prophet's Sunnah with the Promise of Entering Heaven

Sharing food is the Prophet's sunnah that brings rewards and other virtues.

IT expert Kubu Ganjar calls Sirekap a Silent Witness to the Election Crime 2024: Already by Design.

"Today I concluded that the controversy surrounding Sirekap is by design. Therefore, I consider it when the KPU disregards Sirekap by claiming that Sirekap is not used for hierarchical recapitulation. I see Sirekap as a silent witness to the crimes of the 2024 Election.""Leony said."

Data Does Not Match

"Furthermore, the third controversy is that the KPU (Election Commission) closed the numeric information of C1 and D (results). Then, upload the incomplete C1 and D (results) until the determination of the national recapitulation results," "Leony said."

"Today I concluded that the controversy surrounding Sirekap is by design. Therefore, I consider it when the KPU disregards Sirekap by claiming that Sirekap is not used for hierarchical recapitulation. I see Sirekap as a silent witness to the crimes of the 2024 Election."
"Leony said."

"Furthermore, the third controversy is that the KPU (Election Commission) closed the numeric information of C1 and D (results). Then, upload the incomplete C1 and D (results) until the determination of the national recapitulation results,"
"Leony said."