Dream - The Constitutional Court (MK) also rejected the dispute request for the 2024 Presidential Election filed by Ganjar Pranowo-Mahfud Md. MK stated that they rejected the request from Ganjar-Mahfud after considering the arguments presented in the request. "Reject the petitioner's request in its entirety," said Chairman of MK Suhartoyo during the trial at the MK Building, Monday, April 22, 2024.

The following is the translation of the given 'Bahasa' text to 'English' while preserving any html tags: "MK initially stated that it has the authority to adjudicate the applications submitted by Ganjar-Mahfud. The MK judges did not read out the detailed points in consideration of this decision. MK stated that the considerations in this decision are related to the considerations in the decision regarding the lawsuit from Anies-Cak Imin. MK stated that the considerations in the decision of Ganjar-Mahfud have similarities."

Some of the arguments that are stated to be unreasonable according to the law include issues of politicizing social assistance, cawe-cawe or President Joko Widodo's (Jokowi) intervention, and violations of procedures by the KPU when receiving the registration of Prabowo Subianto-Gibran Rakabuming Raka as presidential and vice presidential candidates. "The petitioner's request is deemed unreasonable according to the law," said the judge.

This is the second request rejected by the Constitutional Court (MK) regarding the dispute over the results of the 2024 Presidential Election. The first request, submitted by Anies Baswedan-Muhaimin Iskandar (Cak Imin), was also rejected by the MK. One of the considerations of the MK is the argument requesting the disqualification of candidate number 2, Prabowo Subianto-Gibran Rakabuming Raka. According to the MK, the argument presented by Anies-Cak Imin is legally unfounded.

MK also stated that the KPU as the respondent had taken steps in accordance with the rules in following up on the MK's decision which changed the requirements for the registration of presidential and vice presidential candidates. MK also stated that the allegations that there was nepotism and cawe-cawe (favoritism) from President Joko Widodo (Jokowi) regarding the emergence of the MK's decision which changed the age requirements for presidential and vice presidential candidates were not legally justified.

Then, the Constitutional Court (MK) also stated that there is no evidence of Jokowi's cawe-cawe form conveyed by Anies-Cak Imin in their request with the support of Prabowo-Gibran's votes. There are three MK judges with different opinions (dissenting opinions) regarding the decision. Among them are judges Saldi Isra, Enny Nurbaningsih, and Arief Hidayat.